Soroswap vs UniswapV2

Feature by feature comparison table between UniswapV2 and Soroswap.

These pages are a design-time comparison written while Soroswap was being ported from UniswapV2, kept for the rationale it records. The Rust snippets and function signatures shown here reflect an early version of the contracts, not what is deployed today. For the current API, see Contracts.

Here we can see a comparison of the implementation of UniswapV2 and Soroswap.

Feature	UniswapV2	Soroswap
Algorithm	Automated Market Maker (AMM) with constant product formula	Optimized routing algorithm for multi-pool efficiency
Liquidity Pools	Direct swaps between two tokens; liquidity in equal value pairs	Supports multi-hop swaps through intermediate pools
Smart Contracts	Two core contracts: factory and router	Advanced contracts with aggregated liquidity and custom routing
Routing	Direct matching within or between pools	Sophisticated routing with multiple paths for optimal rates
Efficiency	Fast execution; may not always provide optimal rates	Improved efficiency with better trading rates through optimization
Liquidity Provision	50/50 ratio token pairs; straightforward addition/removal	Complex arrangements; support for multiple AMMs and protocols
Incentives	Fees from trades within pools	Aggregated fees and potentially higher returns
Security	Extensive testing and audits; proven track record	Rigorous audits; advanced security measures
User Experience	Simple, user-friendly interface	Enhanced features; advanced routing and multi-chain support
Documentation	Well-established, extensive community support	Comprehensive documentation and support for new features